And so, as I predicted, I really did not do well in my physics component. Out of 50, I would be grateful if I go 20 or even 15 for that matter; really grateful. On the other hand, the other component (which I spent way too much time on) was quite easy as the lecturer gave us real big hints as to what to study. So cudos to him. Why did I have to be the odd one out and be the only one who did the climate change component of the exam first and then run out of time for the other part? Why can't they tell us on the exam paper, how much time we should be spending on each component? Aren't exam papers meant to clearly state that, at least? Grrr. I guess I can only hate myself for not thinking logically: "2 hours for 2 components. So one hour per component". Sometimes I really do wonder how I got into uni and how I actually passed the first semester. My workmate always hates me for not studying but still getting credit(s) and distinction(s). He says I should be at tafe considering the minimal amount of time I spend on studying on a daily basis. Look. Even now; when I should be studying, I'm on blogger, blogging about random thoughts that ran through my head throughout the whole exam while other people while writing til their little fingers got numb. Oh, I looooooooooooooove you uni oh so much. What would I do without thou?